↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Turkish seaweeds for antiprotozoal, antimycobacterial and cytotoxic activities

Overview of attention for article published in Phytotherapy Research, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evaluation of Turkish seaweeds for antiprotozoal, antimycobacterial and cytotoxic activities
Published in
Phytotherapy Research, November 2010
DOI 10.1002/ptr.3330
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

As part of our continuing research on seaweeds, crude MeOH extracts of two green, three brown and six red algae collected from Marmara, Black, Aegean and Mediterranean Seas were screened. Four parasitic protozoa, i.e. Plasmodium falciparum, Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense, T. cruzi, Leishmania donovani and the tubercle bacillus Mycobacterium tuberculosis were used as test organisms for the in vitro assays. The selective toxicity of the extracts was also determined against mammalian L6 cells. All seaweed extracts were active against T. brucei rhodesiense; the Dasya pedicellata extract was the most potent (IC(50) value 0.37 µg/mL). The same extract also weakly inhibited the growth of T. cruzi (IC(50) 62.02 µg/mL). All seaweed extracts also showed leishmanicidal activity (IC(50) values 16.76-69.98 µg/mL). The majority of the extracts also exhibited antiplasmodial potential and the most potent extracts were those from D. pedicellata (IC(50) 0.38 µg/mL), Codium bursa (IC(50) 1.38 µg/mL) and Caulerpa rasemosa (IC(50) 3.12 µg/mL). One brown and two red algal extracts showed some weak activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MIC values 125-256 µg/mL). Except for the extract of Dasya pedicellata, none of the extracts displayed any cytotoxicity. This is the second study investigating the antiprotozoal activities of Turkish marine algae and identifies Dasya pedicellata, an understudied algal species, as a candidate for further studies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 66 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 13%
Chemistry 6 9%
Unspecified 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 22 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2012.
All research outputs
#22,149,894
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Phytotherapy Research
#2,992
of 3,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,015
of 105,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytotherapy Research
#46
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.