↓ Skip to main content

Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR‐IB criteria

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
26 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Artificial intelligence extension of the OSCAR‐IB criteria
Published in
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, May 2021
DOI 10.1002/acn3.51320
Pubmed ID
Authors

Axel Petzold, Philipp Albrecht, Laura Balcer, Erik Bekkers, Alexander U. Brandt, Peter A. Calabresi, Orla Galvin Deborah, Jennifer S. Graves, Ari Green, Pearse A Keane, Jenny A. Nij Bijvank, Josemir W. Sander, Friedemann Paul, Shiv Saidha, Pablo Villoslada, Siegfried K Wagner, E. Ann Yeh, Orhan Aktas, Jack Antel, Nasrin Asgari, Isabelle Audo, Jagannadha Avasarala, Daly Avril, Francesca R Bagnato, Brenda Banwell, Amit Bar‐Or, Raed Behbehani, Arnaldo Belzunce Manterola, Jeffrey Bennett, Leslie Benson, Jacqueline Bernard, Dominique Bremond‐Gignac, Josefine Britze, Jodie Burton, Jonathan Calkwood, William Carroll, Arvind Chandratheva, Jeffrey Cohen, Giancarlo Comi, Christian Cordano, Silvana Costa, Fiona Costello, Ardith Courtney, Anes Cruz‐Herranz, Gary Cutter, David Crabb, Lindsey Delott, Jerome De Seze, Ricarda Diem, Helene Dollfuss, Nabil K El Ayoubi, Christina Fasser, Carsten Finke, Dominik Fischer, Kathryn Fitzgerald, Pedro Fonseca, Jette L Frederiksen, Elliot Frohman, Teresa Frohman, Kazuo Fujihara, Iñigo Gabilondo Cuellar, Steven Galetta, Elena Garcia‐Martin, Gavin Giovannoni, Brigita Glebauskiene, Inés González Suárez, Gorm Pihl Jensen, Steffen Hamann, Hans‐Peter Hartung, Joachim Havla, Bernhard Hemmer, Su‐Chun Huang, Jaime Imitola, Vytautas Jasinskas, Hong Jiang, Rahele Kafieh, Ludwig Kappos, Randy Kardon, David Keegan, Eric Kildebeck, Ungsoo Samuel Kim, Sasha Klistorner, Benjamin Knier, Scott Kolbe, Thomas Korn, Lauren Krupp, Wolf Lagrèze, Letizia Leocani, Netta Levin, Petra Liskova, Jana Lizrova Preiningerova, Birgit Lorenz, Eugene May, David Miller, Janine Mikolajczak, Saddek Mohand Saïd, Xavier Montalban, Mark Morrow, Ellen Mowry, Joaquim Murta, Carlos Navas, Rachel Nolan, Katarzyna Nowomiejska, Frederike Cosima Oertel, Jiwon Oh, Celia Oreja‐Guevara, Christophe Orssaud, Benjamin Osborne, Olivier Outteryck, Catarina Paiva, Jacky Palace, Athina Papadopoulou, Nikos Patsopoulos, Jana Lizrova Preiningerova, Nikolas Pontikos, Markus Preising, Jerry Prince, Daniel Reich, Robert Rejdak, Marius Ringelstein, Luis Rodriguez de Antonio, Jose‐Alain Sahel, Bernardo Sanchez‐Dalmau, Jaume Sastre‐Garriga, Sven Schippling, Joel Schuman, Ken Shindler, Robert Shin, Neil Shuey, Kerstin Soelberg, Svenja Specovius, Agnese Suppiej, Alan Thompson, Ahmed Toosy, Rubén Torres, Valérie Touitou, Susanne Trauzettel‐Klosinski, Anneke van der Walt, Patrick Vermersch, Angela Vidal‐Jordana, Amy T Waldman, Christian Waters, Russell Wheeler, Owen White, Helmut Wilhelm, Kimberly M Winges, Nils Wiegerinck, Lenja Wiehe, Thomas Wisnewski, Sui Wong, Jens Würfel, Shadi Yaghi, Yuyi You, Zhaoxia Yu, Patrick Yu‐Wai‐Man, Reda Žemaitien≐, Hanna Zimmermann

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Student > Master 6 4%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 76 56%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 20%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 81 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2026.
All research outputs
#2,250,754
of 33,503,639 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
#186
of 1,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,069
of 479,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
#4
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,503,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.