↓ Skip to main content

学習ゲーム開発プラットフォームを利用したゲーム開発者教育の実践

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Digital Games Research, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
学習ゲーム開発プラットフォームを利用したゲーム開発者教育の実践
Published in
Journal of Digital Games Research, October 2019
DOI 10.9762/digraj.7.2_13
Authors

藤本 徹, 岸本 好弘, 西村 圭一, 高橋 薫, 高橋 淳, 谷内 正裕, 山内 祐平

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2021.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digital Games Research
#24
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,537
of 364,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digital Games Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them