↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
81 X users
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reasons for endorsing or rejecting self-binding directives in bipolar disorder: a qualitative study of survey responses from UK service users
Published in
"The Lancet Psychiatry", May 2021
DOI 10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00115-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 6 6%
Lecturer 4 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 54 56%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 8%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 51 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2026.
All research outputs
#733,678
of 34,571,987 outputs
Outputs from "The Lancet Psychiatry"
#541
of 2,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,322
of 487,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from "The Lancet Psychiatry"
#15
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,571,987 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 88.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.