↓ Skip to main content

Changes in energy metabolism after induction therapy in patients with severe or moderate ulcerative colitis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changes in energy metabolism after induction therapy in patients with severe or moderate ulcerative colitis
Published in
Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition, March 2015
DOI 10.3164/jcbn.14-100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mai Inoue, Masaya Sasaki, Azusa Takaoka, Mika Kurihara, Hiromi Iwakawa, Shigeki Bamba, Hiromitsu Ban, Akira Andoh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Mathematics 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2021.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
#362
of 560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,653
of 278,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.