↓ Skip to main content

International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: Revised 2019.

Overview of attention for article published in Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 309)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
686 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: Revised 2019.
Published in
Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, January 2021
DOI 10.46292/sci2702-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 686 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 686 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 48 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 5%
Student > Master 32 5%
Researcher 26 4%
Other 21 3%
Other 60 9%
Unknown 463 67%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 6%
Neuroscience 31 5%
Engineering 14 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 1%
Other 34 5%
Unknown 463 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2026.
All research outputs
#2,198,559
of 34,383,983 outputs
Outputs from Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation
#10
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,629
of 567,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,383,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 567,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.