↓ Skip to main content

Adaptation to climate change of dioecious plants: does gender balance matter?

Overview of attention for article published in Tree Physiology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Adaptation to climate change of dioecious plants: does gender balance matter?
Published in
Tree Physiology, November 2012
DOI 10.1093/treephys/tps105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Costa Rica 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 89 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 6 7%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 51%
Environmental Science 13 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 20 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2019.
All research outputs
#25,768,666
of 32,046,026 outputs
Outputs from Tree Physiology
#1,127
of 1,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,613
of 228,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tree Physiology
#9
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,046,026 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.