You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
うつ病患者のうつ症状と社会適応状態に関連する要因の検討 : 自動思考とストレス対処方略および社会的スキルを関連要因として(原著)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.24468/jjbt.36.2_95 |
| Authors |
田上 明日香, 伊藤 大輔, 大野 真由子, 白井 麻理, 嶋田 洋徳, 鈴木 伸一 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#16,376,857
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies
#111
of 384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,147
of 367,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies
#11
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.