↓ Skip to main content

A case of cardiac tamponade complicating acute type A aortic dissection for which a small amount of pericardial drainage was effective

Overview of attention for article published in NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A case of cardiac tamponade complicating acute type A aortic dissection for which a small amount of pericardial drainage was effective
Published in
NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI, January 2014
DOI 10.3893/jjaam.25.792
Authors

Kouich Fujii, Satoru Miyatake, Masaya Ishiyama, Motomichi Ooki, Hideto Tomioka, Kenichi Kase, Kenji Kobayashi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2021.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI
#154
of 283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,556
of 321,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.