↓ Skip to main content

The Oscillating miRNA 959-964 Cluster Impacts Drosophila Feeding Time and Other Circadian Outputs

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Oscillating miRNA 959-964 Cluster Impacts Drosophila Feeding Time and Other Circadian Outputs
Published in
Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), November 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.10.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We sequenced Drosophila head RNA to identify a small set of miRNAs that undergo robust circadian cycling. We concentrated on a cluster of six miRNAs, mir-959-964, all of which peak at about ZT12 or lights off. The cluster pri-miRNA is transcribed under bona fide circadian transcriptional control, and all six mature miRNAs have short half-lives, a requirement for cycling. A viable Gal4 knockin strain localizes prominent cluster miRNA expression to the adult head fat body. Analysis of cluster knockout and overexpression strains indicates that innate immunity, metabolism, and feeding behavior are under cluster miRNA regulation. Manipulation of food intake also affects the levels and timing of cluster miRNA transcription with no more than minor effects on the core circadian oscillator. These observations indicate a feedback circuit between feeding time and cluster miRNA expression function as well as a surprising role of posttranscriptional regulation in the circadian control of these phenotypes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Portugal 2 2%
France 2 2%
Russia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 85 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 30%
Researcher 24 26%
Student > Master 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 19%
Neuroscience 9 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 9 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2012.
All research outputs
#24,754,523
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#3,519
of 3,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,573
of 244,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#34
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 75.9. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.