↓ Skip to main content

Functional Defecation Disorders and Excessive Body Weight: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatrics, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Functional Defecation Disorders and Excessive Body Weight: A Systematic Review
Published in
Pediatrics, September 2016
DOI 10.1542/peds.2016-1417
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Several studies have suggested an association between functional defecation disorders (FDDs) and overweight/obesity in children. To synthesize current evidence evaluating the association between FDDs and overweight/obesity in children. PubMed, Medline, and Embase were searched from inception until January 25, 2016. Prospective and cross-sectional studies investigating the association between FDDs and overweight/obesity in children 0 to 18 years were included. Data generation was performed independently by 2 authors and quality was assessed by using quality assessment tools from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Eight studies were included: 2 studies evaluating the prevalence of FDDs in obese children, 3 studies evaluating the prevalence of overweight/obesity in children with FDDs, and 3 population-based studies. Both studies in obesity clinics revealed a higher prevalence of functional constipation (21%-23%) compared with the general population (3%-16%). In 3 case-control studies, the prevalence of overweight (12%-33%) and obesity (17%-20%) was found to be higher in FDD patients compared with controls (13%-23% and 0%-12%, respectively), this difference was significant in 2/3 studies. One of 3 population-based studies revealed evidence for an association between FDDs and overweight/obesity. Quality of 7/8 studies was rated fair or poor. Due to heterogeneity of the study designs, we refrained from statistically pooling. Although several studies have revealed the potential association between FDDs and excessive bodyweight in children, results across included studies in this review differ strongly and are conflicting. Therefore, this systematic review could not confirm or refute this association.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 31 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Psychology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 37 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2016.
All research outputs
#21,849,964
of 26,837,848 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#16,979
of 18,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,493
of 329,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#174
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,837,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.5. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.