You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
「加害者治療」の観点から : 暴力加害者への臨床論のために(<特集>「司法臨床」の可能性:司法と心理臨床の協働をめぐって)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Law and Psychology, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.20792/jjlawpsychology.11.1_14 |
| Authors |
中村 正 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2021.
All research outputs
#16,387,242
of 25,870,142 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Law and Psychology
#9
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,980
of 335,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Law and Psychology
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,142 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 22 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.