↓ Skip to main content

The condom imperative in anal sex – one size may not fit all: a qualitative descriptive study of men who have sex with men

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Nursing, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The condom imperative in anal sex – one size may not fit all: a qualitative descriptive study of men who have sex with men
Published in
Journal of Clinical Nursing, November 2016
DOI 10.1111/jocn.13507
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To explore men who have sex with mens' views about condom use when having anal intercourse. Internationally, health promotion campaigns utilise behavioural change strategies to support men who have sex with men to always use condoms when having anal sex with other men. The health promotion message given to this group is consistent and explicitly stated; use a condom every time for anal sex regardless of relationship status. Qualitative analysis of data from a cohort of New Zealand men who have sex with men. A total of 960 useable questionnaires were completed; 571 online and 389 in hard copy. Qualitative data were analysed using a thematic data analytic process. Three themes relating to condom use in men who have sex with men were identified. These are: "Safer sex is good sex", "Condom use is good but …" and "I use condoms sometimes". The range of responses towards condom use for anal sex in MSM in our sample, reveal this as a complex public health issue, with not all MSM willing to consistently use condoms. It is important that nurses do not assume that all MSM are willing to use condoms for anal sex, and should create opportunities for MSM to raise any concerns about the use of condoms. In this way, nurses can assist in providing information that may help MSM to make decisions that will minimise risk of contracting infections associated with sexual activity. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Psychology 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 19 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,137,462
of 27,648,753 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#2,006
of 5,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,832
of 413,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#45
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,648,753 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.