↓ Skip to main content

Population Biology in the Courtroom: The Hudson River Controversy

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience, January 1984
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Population Biology in the Courtroom: The Hudson River Controversy
Published in
BioScience, January 1984
DOI 10.2307/1309420
Authors

L. W. Barnthouse, J. Boreman, S. W. Christensen, C. P. Goodyear, W. Van Winkle, D. S. Vaughan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 15%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Professor 3 23%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 62%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 31%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2012.
All research outputs
#16,491,392
of 24,266,964 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#2,639
of 3,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,632
of 37,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,266,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.