↓ Skip to main content

The Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus on a Burn Trauma Unit

Overview of attention for article published in Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online), January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus on a Burn Trauma Unit
Published in
Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online), January 2015
DOI 10.1086/668032
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We assessed the frequency and relatedness of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates to determine whether healthcare workers, the environment, or admitted patients could be a reservoir for MRSA on a burn trauma unit (BTU). We also assessed risk factors for MRSA colonization among BTU patients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 41%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 15 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2012.
All research outputs
#4,386,887
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online)
#1,530
of 6,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,236
of 409,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online)
#473
of 2,013 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,013 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.