↓ Skip to main content

Epigenetic, diplogenetic, syngenetic, and lithogene deposits

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Geology (geoscienceworld.org), May 1963
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epigenetic, diplogenetic, syngenetic, and lithogene deposits
Published in
Economic Geology (geoscienceworld.org), May 1963
DOI 10.2113/gsecongeo.58.3.315
Authors

Thomas Seward Lovering

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 33%
Student > Master 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 75%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Economic Geology (geoscienceworld.org)
#139
of 735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#317
of 1,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Geology (geoscienceworld.org)
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 735 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them