↓ Skip to main content

ポライトネス理論研究のフロンティア : ポライトネス理論研究の課題とディスコース・ポライトネス理論(敬語研究のフロンティア)

Overview of attention for article published in The Japanese Journal of Language in Society, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ポライトネス理論研究のフロンティア : ポライトネス理論研究の課題とディスコース・ポライトネス理論(敬語研究のフロンティア)
Published in
The Japanese Journal of Language in Society, August 2008
DOI 10.19024/jajls.11.1_4
Authors

宇佐美 まゆみ

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 50%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 1 50%
Social Sciences 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2021.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of Language in Society
#83
of 96 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,645
of 97,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of Language in Society
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.