↓ Skip to main content

Glyphosate: environmental contamination, toxicity and potential risks to human health via food contamination

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 13,370)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
32 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
26 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
6 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
654 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Glyphosate: environmental contamination, toxicity and potential risks to human health via food contamination
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11356-016-7425-3
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Glyphosate has been the most widely used herbicide during the past three decades. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classifies glyphosate as 'practically non-toxic and not an irritant' under the acute toxicity classification system. This classification is based primarily on toxicity data and due to its unique mode of action via a biochemical pathway that only exists in a small number of organisms that utilise the shikimic acid pathway to produce amino acids, most of which are green plants. This classification is supported by the majority of scientific literature on the toxic effects of glyphosate. However, in 2005, the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) reported that glyphosate and its major metabolite, aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), are of potential toxicological concern, mainly as a result of accumulation of residues in the food chain. The FAO further states that the dietary risk of glyphosate and AMPA is unlikely if the maximum daily intake of 1 mg kg(-1) body weight (bw) is not exceeded. Research has now established that glyphosate can persist in the environment, and therefore, assessments of the health risks associated with glyphosate are more complicated than suggested by acute toxicity data that relate primarily to accidental high-rate exposure. We have used recent literature to assess the possible risks associated with the presence of glyphosate residues in food and the environment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 654 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 652 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 100 15%
Student > Master 92 14%
Researcher 58 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 7%
Other 71 11%
Unknown 237 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 60 9%
Chemistry 58 9%
Environmental Science 52 8%
Engineering 22 3%
Other 99 15%
Unknown 266 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 291. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2025.
All research outputs
#152,452
of 34,425,846 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#16
of 13,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,533
of 344,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#1
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,425,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,370 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.