↓ Skip to main content

広島東洋カープファンの株主機能と「広島」地域の活性化 ― 個の最適が全体最適になる時 ―

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Management Philosophy, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
広島東洋カープファンの株主機能と「広島」地域の活性化 ― 個の最適が全体最適になる時 ―
Published in
Journal of Management Philosophy, October 2020
DOI 10.50874/jmp.17.2_60
Authors

粟屋 仁美

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2021.
All research outputs
#14,637,010
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Management Philosophy
#1
of 7 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,456
of 434,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Management Philosophy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them