↓ Skip to main content

Charcot‐marie‐tooth disease subtypes and genetic testing strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Neurology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
patent
5 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
393 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Charcot‐marie‐tooth disease subtypes and genetic testing strategies
Published in
Annals of Neurology, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/ana.22166
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) affects 1 in 2,500 people and is caused by mutations in more than 30 genes. Identifying the genetic cause of CMT is often necessary for family planning, natural history studies, and for entry into clinical trials. However genetic testing can be both expensive and confusing to patients and physicians.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 393 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 382 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 12%
Student > Bachelor 44 11%
Student > Master 42 11%
Other 24 6%
Other 62 16%
Unknown 120 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 12%
Neuroscience 29 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 2%
Other 29 7%
Unknown 135 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2026.
All research outputs
#1,451,914
of 34,294,206 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Neurology
#551
of 6,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,641
of 255,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Neurology
#4
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,294,206 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.