National guidelines endorse adjuvant chemotherapy ± radiotherapy (C ± RT) for early-stage gastric cancer (ESGC). Compliance with these guidelines and the specific impact of adjuvant C ± RT on overall survival (OS) in ESGC have not been extensively explored.
The National Cancer Data Base was queried for stage IB-II gastric adenocarcinoma patients undergoing gastrectomy (1998-2011). Multivariable modeling identified factors associated with adjuvant C ± RT receipt and compared risk-adjusted OS by treatment type (i.e., adjuvant therapy versus surgery alone).
Of 23,461 ESGC patients (1998-2011), 79.4 % and 20.6 % received surgery alone and adjuvant C ± RT (chemoradiotherapy 17.7 %; chemotherapy alone 2.9 %), respectively. Predictors of adjuvant C ± RT receipt included age <67 years, pathologic nodal positivity, and adequate lymph node staging (LNS; ≥15 nodes examined; all p < 0.001). Survival analyses included 15,748 patients (1998-2006); median, 1-, and 5-year survival were 63.5 months, 86.0 %, and 27.0 % respectively. Omission of adjuvant C ± RT conferred an increased hazard of risk-adjusted mortality in the overall cohort, and stage IB and II subgroups (all p ≤ 0.001). The benefit of adjuvant C ± RT was most pronounced in stage II and node-positive patients-regardless of LNS adequacy (all p < 0.001)-and inadequately staged IB patients (p = 0.003). While associated with a trend toward improved OS in node-negative patients overall (p = 0.051), adjuvant C ± RT did not improve OS if surgical LNS was adequate in this subgroup (p = 0.960).
Adoption of adjuvant C ± RT in ESGC remains incomplete nationally. Receipt of adjuvant therapy is associated with improved risk-adjusted survival relative to surgery alone; however, in adequately staged patients without lymph node metastasis, this benefit is less certain.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,816,402
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,308
of 6,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,622
of 299,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#31
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
