↓ Skip to main content

Towards an ontology for data quality in integrated chronic disease management: A realist review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Medical Informatics, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
323 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Towards an ontology for data quality in integrated chronic disease management: A realist review of the literature
Published in
International Journal of Medical Informatics, November 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.10.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Effective use of routine data to support integrated chronic disease management (CDM) and population health is dependent on underlying data quality (DQ) and, for cross system use of data, semantic interoperability. An ontological approach to DQ is a potential solution but research in this area is limited and fragmented.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 2%
Spain 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 306 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 20%
Student > Master 49 15%
Researcher 42 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Student > Bachelor 16 5%
Other 66 20%
Unknown 69 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 82 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 54 17%
Social Sciences 24 7%
Engineering 21 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 4%
Other 47 15%
Unknown 82 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2012.
All research outputs
#21,467,831
of 34,167,806 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Medical Informatics
#1,302
of 2,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,815
of 243,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Medical Informatics
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,167,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.