↓ Skip to main content

Rising popularity of anal intercourse and sexual risk taking: findings from two national probability studies of young Croatian adults

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of STD & AIDS, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rising popularity of anal intercourse and sexual risk taking: findings from two national probability studies of young Croatian adults
Published in
International Journal of STD & AIDS, November 2012
DOI 10.1258/ijsa.2012.011415
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study examined the prevalence and correlates of heterosexual anal intercourse in two national probability samples of young Croatian adults aged 18-25 years, which were collected in 2005 and 2010. The lifetime prevalence of anal intercourse increased from 27% to 36%. In multivariate analysis, reporting four or more lifetime sexual partners was the only correlate of the experience of anal intercourse that was significant among both women (odds ratios [ORs] = 1.78-3.27, P < 0.05) and men (ORs = 3.14-4.63, P < 0.01). Information about condom use at most recent anal intercourse was collected in the 2010 study wave only. Age (OR = 0.80, P < 0.05), female gender (OR = 0.29, P < 0.01), holding more negative attitudes towards condoms (OR = 0.28-0.32, P < 0.05) and reporting condom use at most recent vaginal intercourse (OR = 11.45, 95% Confidence interval [CI] = 5.68-23.06) were associated with using a condom at most recent anal intercourse. Given the substantial prevalence of anal intercourse among young heterosexual adults and considerable sexually transmitted infection/HIV risks associated with the practice, sex education programmes should promote the discussion of health risks associated with anal eroticism.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 24%
Social Sciences 7 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2025.
All research outputs
#8,950,877
of 28,818,276 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of STD & AIDS
#640
of 2,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,006
of 211,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of STD & AIDS
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,818,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,459 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.