↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative structure‐mobility relationship analysis of imidazoline receptor ligands in CDs‐mediated CE

Overview of attention for article published in Electrophoresis, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantitative structure‐mobility relationship analysis of imidazoline receptor ligands in CDs‐mediated CE
Published in
Electrophoresis, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/elps.201200171
Pubmed ID
Authors

Slavica Filipic, Katarina Nikolic, Irena Vovk, Mitja Krizman, Danica Agbaba

Abstract

The performed quantitative structure-mobility relationship (QSMR) study has investigated relative migration times of 11 guanidine/imidazoline derivatives, imidazoline receptor ligands, in CE system containing one of CDs, α-, β-, or γ-CD, using linear and nonlinear modeling methods. The analyzed ligands and their inclusion complexes with CDs were fully examined and optimized at semiempirical parametrized model 3 level. The density functional theory, such as B3LYP/6-31G+(d,p)/3-21G(d)/STO-3G(d,p)/STO-3G(d), and ab initio theory, such as HF/3-21G(d)/STO-3G(d), were applied for molecular descriptors computation of the optimized ligands and their complexes. Predictive performances of the developed QSMR models were tested by use of the cross-validation and external test set prediction. Obtained results for Q(2) values (0.869, 0.911, and 0.966 for CE system containing α-, β-, and γ-CD, respectively) and root mean squared error of prediction (0.239, 0.242, and 0.288 for α-, β-, and γ-CD, respectively) were proved high predictive power of the proposed models. Finally, multitarget QSMR model, using the ligands descriptors (X) and the relative migration time in presence of α-CD (Y1), β-CD (Y2), and γ-CD (Y3), has been created. The multitarget QSMR model can be used as initial screening predictive tool for CE migration behavior of other related guanidine/imidazoline derivatives in presence of α-, β-, and γ-CD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Researcher 2 33%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 2 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2012.
All research outputs
#20,039,697
of 24,629,540 outputs
Outputs from Electrophoresis
#3,047
of 3,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,307
of 316,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electrophoresis
#31
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,629,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,904 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.