↓ Skip to main content

The Jupiter System Through the Eyes of Voyager 1

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 1979
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
102 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
682 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Jupiter System Through the Eyes of Voyager 1
Published in
Science, June 1979
DOI 10.1126/science.204.4396.951
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bradford A. Smith, Laurence A. Soderblom, Torrence V. Johnson, Andrew P. Ingersoll, Stewart A. Collins, Eugene M. Shoemaker, G. E. Hunt, Harold Masursky, Michael H. Carr, Merton E. Davies, Allan F. Cook, Joseph Boyce, G. Edward Danielson, Tobias Owen, Carl Sagan, Reta F. Beebe, Joseph Veverka, Robert G. Strom, John F. McCauley, David Morrison, Geoffrey A. Briggs, Verner E. Suomi

Abstract

The cameras aboard Voyager 1 have provided a closeup view of the Jupiter system, revealing heretofore unknown characteristics and phenomena associated with the planet's atmosphere and the surfaces of its five major satellites. On Jupiter itself, atmospheric motions-the interaction of cloud systems-display complex vorticity. On its dark side, lightning and auroras are observed. A ring was discovered surrounding Jupiter. The satellite surfaces display dramatic differences including extensive active volcanismn on Io, complex tectonism on Ganymnede and possibly Europa, and flattened remnants of enormous impact features on Callisto.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 67 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 20 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 19%
Chemistry 4 6%
Engineering 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 20 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,653,965
of 24,126,099 outputs
Outputs from Science
#24,234
of 79,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105
of 6,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#6
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,126,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.