↓ Skip to main content

The Theory of Kinesio Taping® and Basic Application Methods

Overview of attention for article published in Rigakuryoho Kagaku, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Theory of Kinesio Taping® and Basic Application Methods
Published in
Rigakuryoho Kagaku, January 2012
DOI 10.1589/rika.27.239
Authors

Kazuya YOSHIDA

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 29%
Student > Master 4 19%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 43%
Sports and Recreations 4 19%
Psychology 1 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2012.
All research outputs
#20,172,971
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Rigakuryoho Kagaku
#196
of 227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,211
of 244,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rigakuryoho Kagaku
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 227 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.