↓ Skip to main content

人間ドックで発見された潰瘍性大腸炎

Overview of attention for article published in Official Journal of Japan Society of Ningen Dock, December 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
人間ドックで発見された潰瘍性大腸炎
Published in
Official Journal of Japan Society of Ningen Dock, December 2004
DOI 10.11320/ningendock1986.19.590
Authors

石井 史, 屋代 庫人, 田中 美紀, 杉山 茂樹, 橋本 洋

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,142,828
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Official Journal of Japan Society of Ningen Dock
#4
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,449
of 151,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Official Journal of Japan Society of Ningen Dock
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 37 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them