↓ Skip to main content

Can chainsaw carved hollows provide an effective solution to the loss of natural tree cavities for arboreal mammals?

Overview of attention for article published in Forest Ecology & Management, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Can chainsaw carved hollows provide an effective solution to the loss of natural tree cavities for arboreal mammals?
Published in
Forest Ecology & Management, June 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119122
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 17%
Researcher 5 17%
Other 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 23%
Environmental Science 6 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2025.
All research outputs
#827,149
of 34,139,555 outputs
Outputs from Forest Ecology & Management
#128
of 7,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,181
of 489,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Ecology & Management
#2
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,139,555 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 489,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.