You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rituximab投与ABO血液型不適合生体肝移植における安全性と有効性に関する後方視的調査研究
|
---|---|
Published in |
Japanese Journal of Transplantation, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.11386/jst.50.062 |
Authors |
江川 裕人, 尾形 哲, 山本 雅一, 高原 武志, 若林 剛, 藤山 泰二, 高田 泰次, 保田 裕子, 八木 孝仁, 岡島 英明, 海道 利実, 上本 伸二, 伊藤 孝司, 吉村 了勇, 吉住 朋晴, 調 憲, 前原 喜彦, 阪本 靖介, 猪股 裕紀洋, 篠田 昌宏, 板野 理, 北川 雄光, 川岸 直樹, 石山 宏平, 井手 健太郎, 大段 秀樹, 水野 修吾, 伊佐地 秀司, 浅岡 忠史, 永野 浩昭, 梅下 浩司, 日髙 匡章, 江口 晋, 小倉 靖弘 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 7 | 22% |
Unknown | 25 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,448,307
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Transplantation
#2
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,923
of 271,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Transplantation
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one scored the same or higher as 20 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them