↓ Skip to main content

Neurobehavioral problems following low-level exposure to organophosphate pesticides: a systematic and meta-analytic review

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Toxicology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 761)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Neurobehavioral problems following low-level exposure to organophosphate pesticides: a systematic and meta-analytic review
Published in
Critical Reviews in Toxicology, November 2012
DOI 10.3109/10408444.2012.738645
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Meta-analysis was carried out to determine the neurotoxic effects of long-term exposure to low levels of organophosphates (OPs) in occupational settings. Concern about the effects of OPs on human health has been growing as they are increasingly used throughout the world for a variety of agricultural, industrial and domestic purposes. The neurotoxic effects of acute poisoning are well established but the possibility that low-level exposure causes ill health is controversial. It is important to get a clear answer to this question as more individuals are at risk of low-level exposure than acute poisoning. Although a number of reviews on this topic have been published in the past, authors have come to conflicting conclusions. To date, none of these reviews have attempted quantitative evaluation of study findings using meta-analysis. This paper reviews the available evidence concerning the neurotoxicity of low-level occupational exposure to OPs and goes on to report the results of a meta-analysis of 14 studies which fulfilled criteria for this type of statistical analysis (means and standard deviations of dependant variables reported). Data were assimilated from more than 1600 participants. The majority of well designed studies found a significant association between low-level exposure to OPs and impaired neurobehavioral function which is consistent, small to moderate in magnitude and concerned primarily with cognitive functions such as psychomotor speed, executive function, visuospatial ability, working and visual memory. Unresolved issues in the literature which should become the focus of further studies are highlighted and discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 229 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 15%
Student > Master 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Researcher 23 10%
Other 17 7%
Other 48 20%
Unknown 60 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 11%
Environmental Science 18 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 6%
Neuroscience 13 6%
Other 61 26%
Unknown 69 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2025.
All research outputs
#437,677
of 32,572,863 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Toxicology
#20
of 761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,588
of 334,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Toxicology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,572,863 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them