↓ Skip to main content

Modification, calibration, and comparative testing of an automated surgical keratometer.

Overview of attention for article published in Refractive corneal surgery, March 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 109)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Modification, calibration, and comparative testing of an automated surgical keratometer.
Published in
Refractive corneal surgery, March 1991
DOI 10.3928/1081-597x-19910301-09
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2001.
All research outputs
#12,345,312
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from Refractive corneal surgery
#16
of 109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,361
of 24,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Refractive corneal surgery
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 109 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them