You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Strategic testing approaches for targeted disease monitoring can be used to inform pandemic decision-making
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Biology, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001307 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
James D. Nichols, Tiffany L. Bogich, Emily Howerton, Ottar N. Bjørnstad, Rebecca K. Borchering, Matthew Ferrari, Murali Haran, Christopher Jewell, Kim M. Pepin, William J. M. Probert, Juliet R. C. Pulliam, Michael C. Runge, Michael Tildesley, Cécile Viboud, Katriona Shea |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 21% |
France | 2 | 7% |
Chile | 1 | 4% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | 4% |
Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
Greece | 1 | 4% |
Japan | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 13 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 57% |
Scientists | 8 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Professor | 2 | 5% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 14 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 21% |
Unknown | 20 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2022.
All research outputs
#348,014
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#713
of 8,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,769
of 458,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#18
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.