↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of traditional and molecular methods of typing isolates of Staphylococcus aureus

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
patent
11 patents
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparison of traditional and molecular methods of typing isolates of Staphylococcus aureus
Published in
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, February 1994
DOI 10.1128/jcm.32.2.407-415.1994
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 115 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Researcher 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 8%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 20 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 5%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 24 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2017.
All research outputs
#2,515,244
of 34,043,423 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#1,151
of 19,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,766
of 102,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#6
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,043,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.