You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
漆器に用いられる主要な下地法強度比較 : 地域の文化に根ざした伝統的技術・技法のデザイン活用・展開に関する調査研究(2)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.11247/jssdj.50.41_1 |
| Authors |
町田 俊一 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2021.
All research outputs
#15,485,623
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design
#54
of 165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,446
of 326,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design
#11
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.