↓ Skip to main content

Family Secrets and Family Functioning: The Case of Donor Assistance

Overview of attention for article published in Family Process, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Family Secrets and Family Functioning: The Case of Donor Assistance
Published in
Family Process, November 2008
DOI 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2008.00271.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between adult offspring's perception of family functioning and of parental use of topic avoidance to maintain secrecy regarding the use of donor assistance to conceive. A cross-sectional design was used to study a convenience sample of 69 young adult donor offspring who completed a demographic questionnaire, a topic avoidance scale relative to each of their rearing parents, and the Beavers Self Report Family Instrument. Findings indicated that participants perceived both parents as avoiding the topic of donor assistance more than other topics, mothers as avoiding all topics less than fathers, and topic avoidance was negatively associated with family functioning. Mothers' general topic avoidance was the strongest predictor of family functioning. Parents' disclosing together was predictive of higher family functioning. Implications for practice and future research are suggested.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 32%
Social Sciences 10 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 16 30%