↓ Skip to main content

Combined acetaminophen and ibuprofen for pain relief after oral surgery in adults: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users
patent
11 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
27 Redditors
guideline
1 clinical guideline source
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Combined acetaminophen and ibuprofen for pain relief after oral surgery in adults: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, January 2010
DOI 10.1093/bja/aep338
Pubmed ID
Authors

A.F. Merry, R.D. Gibbs, J. Edwards, G.S. Ting, C. Frampton, E. Davies, B.J. Anderson

Abstract

Acetaminophen is often used with a non-steriodal anti-inflammatory drug for acute pain. Hitherto, these drugs have had to be given separately, typically at different time intervals. Maxigesic tablets combine acetaminophen and ibuprofen in clinically appropriate doses to simplify administration and dosage regimen. We compared this combination with each of the constituent drugs for the relief of pain after extraction of third molar teeth.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 209 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Other 15 7%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 46 21%
Unknown 74 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 77 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2026.
All research outputs
#1,247,887
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#327
of 8,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,622
of 234,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia
#2
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.