Project Khanya: results from a pilot randomized type 1 hybrid effectiveness‐implementation trial of a peer‐delivered behavioural intervention for ART adherence and substance use in HIV care in South…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International AIDS Society, June 2021

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

news: 1 news outlet

twitter: 2 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 173 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Project Khanya: results from a pilot randomized type 1 hybrid effectiveness‐implementation trial of a peer‐delivered behavioural intervention for ART adherence and substance use in HIV care in South Africa
Published in	Journal of the International AIDS Society, June 2021
DOI	10.1002/jia2.25720
Pubmed ID	34164935
Authors	Jessica F Magidson, John A Joska, Jennifer M Belus, Lena S Andersen, Kristen S Regenauer, Alexandra L Rose, Bronwyn Myers, Sybil Majokweni, Conall O’Cleirigh, Steven A Safren

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
United States	2	100%

Demographic breakdown

Type
Type	Count	As %
Scientists	1	50%
Members of the public	1	50%

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Unknown	173	100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Master	18	10%
Student > Ph. D. Student	13	8%
Lecturer	12	7%
Student > Bachelor	10	6%
Researcher	10	6%
Other	25	14%
Unknown	85	49%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Nursing and Health Professions	22	13%
Medicine and Dentistry	19	11%
Psychology	12	7%
Social Sciences	9	5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science	4	2%
Other	19	11%
Unknown	88	51%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2025.

All research outputs

#3,653,013

of 28,462,860 outputs

Outputs from Journal of the International AIDS Society

#640

of 2,281 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#76,929

of 464,123 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International AIDS Society

#25

of 65 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 28,462,860 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 2,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.