You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
日本人英語学習者の曖昧文理解における動詞下位範疇化情報の使用
|
---|---|
Published in |
GENGO KENKYU (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan), October 2019
|
DOI | 10.11435/gengo.155.0_1 |
Authors |
中村 智栄, 新井 学, 原田 康也 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Argentina | 1 | 20% |
Japan | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,219,718
of 25,608,265 outputs
Outputs from GENGO KENKYU (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan)
#33
of 175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,620
of 363,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GENGO KENKYU (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan)
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,608,265 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.