↓ Skip to main content

Activation of H2 over the Ru−Zn Bond in the Transition Metal−Lewis Acid Heterobimetallic Species [Ru(IPr)2(CO)ZnEt]+

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Chemical Society, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Activation of H2 over the Ru−Zn Bond in the Transition Metal−Lewis Acid Heterobimetallic Species [Ru(IPr)2(CO)ZnEt]+
Published in
Journal of the American Chemical Society, August 2016
DOI 10.1021/jacs.6b05243
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Reaction of [Ru(IPr)2(CO)H]BAr(F)4 with ZnEt2 forms the heterobimetallic species [Ru(IPr)2(CO)ZnEt]BAr(F)4 (2) which features an unsupported Ru-Zn bond. 2 reacts with H2 to give [Ru(IPr)2(CO)(η(2)-H2)(H)2ZnEt]BAr(F)4 (3) and [Ru(IPr)2(CO)(H)2ZnEt]BAr(F)4 (4). DFT calculations indicate H2 activation at 2 proceeds via oxidative cleavage at Ru with concomitant hydride transfer to Zn. 2 can also activate hydridic E-H bonds (E = B, Si) and computed mechanisms for the facile H/H exchange processes observed in 3 and 4 are presented.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 24%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 43 73%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2016.
All research outputs
#22,159,877
of 34,185,767 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#78,491
of 89,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,445
of 335,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#416
of 574 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,185,767 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 574 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.