↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of animal diseases caused by bacteria resistant to antimicrobials: Dogs and cats

Overview of attention for article published in EFSA Journal, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Assessment of animal diseases caused by bacteria resistant to antimicrobials: Dogs and cats
Published in
EFSA Journal, June 2021
DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6680
Pubmed ID
Authors

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare, Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Dominique Joseph Bicout, Paolo Calistri, Elisabetta Canali, Julian Ashley Drewe, Bruno Garin‐Bastuji, Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas, Christian Gortazar Schmidt, Mette Herskin, Virginie Michel, Miguel Angel Miranda Chueca, Barbara Padalino, Paolo Pasquali, Helen Clare Roberts, Liisa Helena Sihvonen, Hans Spoolder, Karl Stahl, Antonio Velarde, Arvo Viltrop, Christoph Winckler, Luca Guardabassi, Friederike Hilbert, Rodolphe Mader, Inma Aznar, Francesca Baldinelli, Julio Alvarez

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 2 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 4%
Student > Master 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 29 58%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 29 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2021.
All research outputs
#15,181,325
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from EFSA Journal
#4,231
of 4,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,149
of 453,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EFSA Journal
#25
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.