Close proximity risk assessment for SARS-CoV-2 infection

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, June 2021

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news: 21 news outlets
policy: 2 policy sources

twitter: 179 X users
podcasts: 1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley: 91 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 193 X posts from 179 X users, with an upper bound of 998,189 followers.

‘…but does not support WHO’ The superb @EvonneTCurran getting into the details of how ‘supporting references’ do anything but

54 Another modelling study asking do droplets and aerosols reach.... This is not a study showing that if they reach droplets and virus payload enter. NB Beyond 0.81m only risk is from airborne (personal) Its very good but does not support @WHO https:/…

Ook van nabij vormen aerosolen de belangrijkste besmettingsroute "Infection risk in close-contact is dominated by airborne droplets" https://t.co/TDWExRKZXB 3/n

@peterdedecker @TijlDeBie @jdceulaer 2."Blootstelling te beperkt om verschil te maken" "Infection risk in close-contact is dominated by airborne droplets" https://t.co/TDWExRKZXB + "Room ventilation rate significantly affects the short-range airborne r…

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 189 additional X posts.