You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spectrum of Third Window Abnormalities: Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and Beyond
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a4922 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M.-L. Ho, G. Moonis, C.F. Halpin, H.D. Curtin |
| Abstract |
Third window abnormalities are defects in the integrity of the bony structure of the inner ear, classically producing sound-/pressure-induced vertigo (Tullio and Hennebert signs) and/or a low-frequency air-bone gap by audiometry. Specific anatomic defects include semicircular canal dehiscence, perilabyrinthine fistula, enlarged vestibular aqueduct, dehiscence of the scala vestibuli side of the cochlea, X-linked stapes gusher, and bone dyscrasias. We discuss these various entities and provide key examples from our institutional teaching file with a discussion of symptomatology, temporal bone CT, audiometry, and vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 39% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 23% |
| Unknown | 26 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 54% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,661,045
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#217
of 5,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,217
of 348,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#4
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.