↓ Skip to main content

Enzymatic Vitreolysis with Ocriplasmin for Vitreomacular Traction and Macular Holes

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Enzymatic Vitreolysis with Ocriplasmin for Vitreomacular Traction and Macular Holes
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, November 2012
DOI 10.1056/nejmc1211068
Pubmed ID

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2012.
All research outputs
#17,671,894
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#28,198
of 30,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,389
of 275,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#282
of 367 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 116.5. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 367 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.