↓ Skip to main content

シイタケの胞子欠損性変異体の分離と変異形質に連鎖するSNPの同定

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Mycology, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
シイタケの胞子欠損性変異体の分離と変異形質に連鎖するSNPの同定
Published in
Japanese Journal of Mycology, June 2021
DOI 10.18962/jjom.jjom.r02-08
Authors

小畠 靖, 白井 伸生, 河合 昌孝, 村口 元, 坂本 裕一, 松本 晃幸

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2021.
All research outputs
#23,196,947
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Mycology
#56
of 56 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#384,322
of 447,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Mycology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them