You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nothing about us without us: involving patient collaborators for machine learning applications in rheumatology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220454 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie J W Shoop-Worrall, Katherine Cresswell, Imogen Bolger, Beth Dillon, Kimme L Hyrich, Nophar Geifman, Members of the CLUSTER consortium, Elizabeth Ralph, Fatjon Dekaj, Beth Jebson, Zoe Wanstall, Aline Kimonyo, Fatema Merali, Emma Sumner, Emily Robinson, Anew Dick, Michael W. Beresford, Emil Carlsson, Joanna Fairlie, Jenna F. Gritzfeld, Athimalaipet Ramanan, Teresa Duerr, Michael Barnes, Sana Ng, Wendy Thoon, Kimme Hyrich, Nophar Geifman, Soumya Raychaudhuri, Anew Morris, Annie Yarwood, Samantha Smith, Damian Tarasek, Stephanie Shoop-Worrall, Saskia Lawson-Tovey, Paul Martin, Stephen Eyre, Chris Wallace, Wei-Yu Lin, Toby Kent, Thierry Sornasse, Jessica, Neisen; Sally-Anne Dews, Gil Reynolds Diogo, John Ioannou, Hussein Al-Mossawi, Helen Neale |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 41% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 77% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Librarian | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,836,635
of 28,152,116 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#2,012
of 9,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,898
of 458,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#52
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,152,116 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.