↓ Skip to main content

Systematic Criteria for Type and Screen Based on Procedure’s Probability of Erythrocyte Transfusion

Overview of attention for article published in Survey of Anesthesiology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Systematic Criteria for Type and Screen Based on Procedure’s Probability of Erythrocyte Transfusion
Published in
Survey of Anesthesiology, October 2012
DOI 10.1097/01.sa.0000418899.14247.63
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2012.
All research outputs
#22,692,577
of 27,778,980 outputs
Outputs from Survey of Anesthesiology
#157
of 1,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,405
of 197,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Survey of Anesthesiology
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,778,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,010 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.