↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Exploring Trends in Metal–Metal Bonding, Spectroscopic Properties, and Conformational Flexibility in a Series of Heterobimetallic Ti/M and V/M Complexes (M = Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu)
Published in
Inorganic Chemistry, August 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b01543
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To understand the metal-metal bonding and conformational flexibility of first-row transition metal heterobimetallic complexes, a series of heterobimetallic Ti/M and V/M complexes (M = Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu) have been investigated. The titanium tris(phosphinoamide) precursors ClTi(XylNP(i)Pr2)3 (1) and Ti(XylNP(i)Pr2)3 (2) have been used to synthesize Ti/Fe (3), Ti/Ni (4, 4(THF)), and Ti/Cu (5) heterobimetallic complexes. A series of V/M (M = Fe (7), Co (8), Ni (9), and Cu (10)) complexes have been generated starting from the vanadium tris(phosphinoamide) precursor V(XylNP(i)Pr2)3 (6). The new heterobimetallic complexes were characterized and studied by NMR spectroscopy, X-ray crystallography, electron paramagnetic resonance, and Mössbauer spectroscopy, where applicable, and computational methods (DFT). Compounds 3, 4(THF), 7, and 8 are C3-symmetric with three bridging phosphinoamide ligands, while compounds 9 and 10 adopt an asymmetric geometry with two bridging phosphinoamides and one phosphinoamide ligand bound η(2) to vanadium. Compounds 4 and 5, on the other hand, are asymmetric in the solid state but show evidence for fluxional behavior in solution. A correlation is established between conformational flexibility and metal-metal bond order, which has important implications for the future reactivity of these and other heterobimetallic molecules.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 37%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Student > Master 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 36 73%
Computer Science 2 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2016.
All research outputs
#6,064,432
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Inorganic Chemistry
#3,179
of 21,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,836
of 337,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inorganic Chemistry
#25
of 387 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,709 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 387 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.