You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global application of an unoccupied aerial vehicle photogrammetry protocol for predicting aboveground biomass in non‐forest ecosystems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/rse2.228 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew M. Cunliffe, Karen Anderson, Fabio Boschetti, Richard E. Brazier, Hugh A. Graham, Isla H. Myers‐Smith, Thomas Astor, Matthias M. Boer, Leonor G. Calvo, Patrick E. Clark, Michael D. Cramer, Miguel S. Encinas‐Lara, Stephen M. Escarzaga, José M. Fernández‐Guisuraga, Adrian G. Fisher, Kateřina Gdulová, Breahna M. Gillespie, Anne Griebel, Niall P. Hanan, Muhammad S. Hanggito, Stefan Haselberger, Caroline A. Havrilla, Phil Heilman, Wenjie Ji, Jason W. Karl, Mario Kirchhoff, Sabine Kraushaar, Mitchell B. Lyons, Irene Marzolff, Marguerite E. Mauritz, Cameron D. McIntire, Daniel Metzen, Luis A. Méndez‐Barroso, Simon C. Power, Jiří Prošek, Enoc Sanz‐Ablanedo, Katherine J. Sauer, Damian Schulze‐Brüninghoff, Petra Šímová, Stephen Sitch, Julian L. Smit, Caiti M. Steele, Susana Suárez‐Seoane, Sergio A. Vargas, Miguel Villarreal, Fleur Visser, Michael Wachendorf, Hannes Wirnsberger, Robert Wojcikiewicz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 20% |
| Spain | 3 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Ghana | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 63% |
| Scientists | 14 | 34% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 18 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 33 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,142,418
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
#52
of 322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,674
of 450,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.