↓ Skip to main content

MT1-MMP-dependent ECM processing regulates laminB1 stability and mediates replication fork restart

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
MT1-MMP-dependent ECM processing regulates laminB1 stability and mediates replication fork restart
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2021
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0253062
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Researcher 1 11%
Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Computer Science 1 11%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Chemistry 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2021.
All research outputs
#18,143,395
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#151,804
of 199,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,373
of 440,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,163
of 2,786 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,786 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.