↓ Skip to main content

Structure and Function of the RING Domains of RNF20 and RNF40, Dimeric E3 Ligases that Monoubiquitylate Histone H2B

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Biology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Structure and Function of the RING Domains of RNF20 and RNF40, Dimeric E3 Ligases that Monoubiquitylate Histone H2B
Published in
Journal of Molecular Biology, August 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.07.025
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Monoubiquitylation of histone H2B is a post-translational mark that plays key roles in transcription regulation and genome stability. In humans, attachment of ubiquitin to lysine 120 of histone H2B depends on the activity of the E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, Ube2B, and the RING E3 ligases, RNF20 and RNF40. To better understand the molecular basis of this modification, we have solved the crystal structure of the RNF20 RING domain and show that it is a homodimer that specifically interacts with the Ube2B~Ub conjugate. By mutating residues at the E3-E2 and E3-ubiquitin interfaces we identify key contacts required for interaction of the RNF20 RING domain with the Ube2B~Ub conjugate. These mutants were used to generate a structure-based model of the RNF20-Ube2B~Ub complex that reveals differences from other RING-E2~Ub complexes, and suggests how the RNF20-Ube2B~Ub complex might interact with its nucleosomal substrate. Additionally, we show that the RING domains of RNF20 and RNF40 can form a stable heterodimer that is active. Our studies provide new insights into the mechanisms that regulate RNF20-mediated ubiquitin transfer from Ube2B.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 24%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 16 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 15%
Chemistry 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Biology
#10,355
of 11,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,123
of 351,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Biology
#25
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.